Ada Lovelace (Photo: Science & Society Picture Gallery) |
For
2016, there is a remarkable coincidence in celebrating Ada Lovelace Day. As
a result of youth advocacy around the world, the U.N. has since 2011 declared
October 11 as the International Day of the Girl Child, with its mission stated as “to
help galvanize worldwide enthusiasm for goals to better girls’ lives, providing
an opportunity for them to show leadership and reach their full potential.” The
United States "branch" of this global movement — as described by the
U.N. — encourages activist groups to come together under the same goal to
highlight, discuss, and take action to advance rights and opportunities for
girls everywhere. So for the United Nations, October 11 celebrates not just a
day but, as the U.N. describes it, a movement.
Mrs. Obama with her Let Girls Learn students (Photo: go4womens.org) |
It's
a tall order, and I'm brave enough to try to bring together — in this post — a
look at how it might all be connected. And for this grandfather of six sensational
young women (plus a sensational young grandson as well), I like thinking about
what their lives are going to be like as they move into this world we've
created with digitized information, knowledge services, and — more important
than anything else — strategic learning. We're all going to be required to give
more and more attention to knowledge sharing (which we all accept is the
fundamental attribute of learning, whether it's learning for the workplace and
our career interests or simply learning so we can strengthen and enhance our
own personal capabilities). So while I don't give less consideration to what's
happening with boys and young men, I particularly like thinking about Ada Lovelace in this connection. In one way, she brought together
for us all that we're experiencing with knowledge sharing today.
[And
certainly our First Lady is doing her part. Of course Let Girls Learn is
amazingly serious — and we all admire her and the President greatly for what
they are doing. But she also has very novel ways — or perhaps not so novel —
for getting the message out. If you don't believe me go to her appearance on Carpool Karaoke and have some fun!]
But
I digress. What I'm trying to do here is give some attention to how far we've
come, and the only place I can seriously begin is with — to use her more formal
title — Augusta Ada King-Noel, Countess of Lovelace (1815-1852). The only
legitimate child of Lord Byron and Anne Isabella Milbanke ("Anabella"),
Lady Wentworth, she never really knew her father, as he left England when she
was just a few months old. He died, without her ever seeing him again, when she
was eight years old.
Ada Lovelace (Photo: English Wikipedia) |
For
the “real” Ada, it wasn’t particularly easy going. There were problems with her
mother, whose bitterness — probably warranted — about her husband’s departure
seemed to make her fear that Ada would turn out to be too sensitive (today we
would probably say “high-strung”). So Ada was pushed into mathematics and
technology to perhaps distract her from more ethereal and what we would call "cultural" interests; you can certainly see the connection with young women thinking about careers in STEM today, can’t
you? She seems to have not been able to pull herself completely away from
thinking about her father’s literary and poetical direction (she even referred
to how she considered mathematics and her interests as “poetical science”), so
she became an early example, a living example of an intellectual woman who
could combine the arts and the sciences. Obviously in her case the sciences won
out.
Ada Lovelace House 12 St. James Square, London (Photo: Andrew Berner) |
At
the Ada Lovelace Day site we get a good summary of some of what she did in a
neat little two-paragraph introduction for people meeting up with Ada for the
first time:
Born in 1815, Ada Lovelace collaborated with inventor Charles Babbage on his general purpose computing machine, the Analytical Engine. In 1843, Lovelace published what we would now call a computer program to generate Bernoulli Numbers. Whilst Babbage had written fragments of programs before, Lovelace's was the most complete, most elaborate and the first published.
More importantly, Lovelace was the first person to foresee the creative potential of the Engine. She explained how it could do so much more than merely calculate numbers, and could potentially create music and art, given the right programming and inputs. Her vision of computing's possibilities was unmatched by any of her peers and went unrecognized for a century.
And while there has been, from time to time, some controversy about her writings, with evidence offered that Babbage probably wrote more of her material than was recognized at the time, the controversy does not weaken the case for her importance to those of us who deal with knowledge services. And she was, indeed, good at music and art even though her true intellectual success came with
her scientific studies. This was of course long before C.P. Snow and his writings
about the two cultures (The Two Cultures and the Scientific Revolution).
In 1959 — and long beyond — he had us all thinking about how combining the
sciences and the humanities is required if we are not to “impede progress” in
solving the world’s problems. Nevertheless Snow’s work and much that came after
it (and still being discussed) demonstrates to us that with the right
encouragement, the two cultures can work together to bring about important, nay
critical and essential societal change.
This assertion becomes clear when we look back on Ada’s story, by now having been told in many places, including a rather
well-told tale in an updated chapter (Ada
Lovelace: Victorian Computer Visionary) from the
2nd edition of the STEM anthology A Passion for Science: Tales of Discovery and Invention, available
at the Ada Lovelace
Day site. I have two particular favorites, both fairly recent. James Gleick — a
master story-teller himself — has a great time with Ada’s story in The
Information — A History, a Theory, a Flood (New York: Pantheon, 2011). Even
more fun is Walter Isaacson’s The Innovators — How a Group of Hackers,
Geniuses, and Geeks Created the Digital Revolution (New York: Simon and
Schuster, 2014). Isaacson not only opens his book with Ada, he closes it with
valuable conclusions about her and her contribution. This is my take-away from
Isaacson at the end of his book:
This interplay between technology and the arts
will eventually result in completely new forms of expression and formats of
media. “This innovation will come from people who are able to link beauty to engineering,
humanity to technology, and poetry to processors,” coming from “creators who can flourish where the arts intersect with the sciences and
who have a rebellious sense of wonder that opens them to the beauty of both.”
_____
Guy
St. Clair is the author of Knowledge Services: A Strategic Framework
for the 21st Century Organization (Munich and Boston: De Gruyter,
2016). His Amazon author page is amazon.com/author/guystclair.